|
Post by Eric formerly Eric on Aug 10, 2017 7:52:41 GMT -6
So... some big changed announced with this year's Chapter Approved. Namely 1. Flyers cant hold objectives 2. Troops have obsec again 3. 1st turn is a rolloff with +1 for finishing deployment first (in the new missions; stays the same in current missions)
What do people think?
|
|
|
Post by Nick P on Aug 10, 2017 8:24:14 GMT -6
Where'd you see that? The flyer thing was in the last FAQ so that makes sense, but the obsec and the rolloff are definitely new - and honestly, a welcome change in order to make games more balanced. I can stop focusing on how many drops I have and focus on building a fun list.
|
|
|
Post by Eric formerly Eric on Aug 10, 2017 8:29:46 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Joelercoaster on Aug 10, 2017 9:06:09 GMT -6
I liked ObSec in terms of 7th, as it gave a real, thematic purpose to troops... I haven't played enough 8th to really weigh in much, but my gut reaction is to think this would be a boon to more elite armies, as a smaller troop unit can still hold off vs a 'happens to have more guys' elites or whatever. The "number of bodies" thing just seems to be way in favor of orks/nids with 30-strong units.
|
|
|
Post by Nick P on Aug 10, 2017 9:25:34 GMT -6
I see this as a huge disadvantage for horde armies - because a group of 5 space marines is going to hold an objective over 20 GSC genestealers now, or 15 razorwings, or 30 stormboyz - and a unit of 5 space marines has exactly as much holding power as a unit of 30 gaunts. So it puts more elite armies - and troop focused armies - on an even playing field with horde armies or non-troop spam armies. I like it alot.
Also Eric good call, the FAQ was about tabling, not objectives - very interesting!
|
|
doubleback
novice
I rock harder than most, yet less hard than some.
Posts: 1,262
|
Post by doubleback on Aug 10, 2017 9:44:49 GMT -6
I see this as a huge disadvantage for horde armies - because a group of 5 space marines is going to hold an objective over 20 GSC genestealers now, or 15 razorwings, or 30 stormboyz - and a unit of 5 space marines has exactly as much holding power as a unit of 30 gaunts. So it puts more elite armies - and troop focused armies - on an even playing field with horde armies or non-troop spam armies. I like it alot. Also Eric good call, the FAQ was about tabling, not objectives - very interesting! Unless I am misreading this, then in the case that two troops are both vying for the same objective, it comes down to numbers. Would the flip side of this not also be true then? Horde armies often field much larger troop blobs for cheaper, meaning that most of the time that 5 space marines will be competing against 4-5 times their number of boyz that cost about the same, and will almost always come up short for the objective. Marines already had objective secured via their codex, so this at least evens things up a little bit. I could be wrong, but on average I feild 3-5 groups of 30 boys, and I rarely see my Space marine opponents field much more than that in groups of marines.
|
|
|
Post by Nick P on Aug 10, 2017 9:49:51 GMT -6
Shit that's what I get for not reading it in full - you're right, it does still come down to numbers. So its really just a good way to beat out armies that focus on non-troop spam like razorwing flocks, stormboyz, necron destroyers, etc. Still should be good for balance and helping people focus more on troops, but yeah horde armies will be just as good at grabbing objectives as always so long as those hordes are troop choices.
|
|
|
Post by rogerspacem on Aug 10, 2017 10:23:41 GMT -6
Silly question: but if I'm correct these rules take effect now don't they? Okay well overall I think it's fine. The additional rules that is. Obj sec. Is restricted to a specific faction detachment/s, first turn roll off is better cause honest it just limited the whole list building aspect, and flyers not holding objectives...while great overall people seem to be forgetting about chaos's heldrake. Its not as good as the other flyers available and now it can't hold objectives (plus it doesn't have supersonic or hard to hit). Still overall the change-up is fine. I'm curious though what else they might change. Also when is the "chapter approved" book coming out? Or is it just similar to FAQ?
|
|
|
Post by Eric formerly Eric on Aug 10, 2017 10:46:46 GMT -6
I agree. This is such an overreaction. They should instead increase the cost of flyers. Thats the balance system they put in place... they should use it. I thought they were trying to homogenize unit types in 8th (same profiles for vehicles, etc.), not put out totally different rules for different keywords.
|
|
|
Post by Nick P on Aug 10, 2017 11:11:17 GMT -6
I disagree - a flying vehicle that can't land can't possibly hold territory or an objective, it is a great support unit but shouldn't be able to hold objectives. They're very powerful with their high toughness, lots of wounds, good saves, good weapons, and extremely fast movement - they also don't have firing arcs anymore, so positioning doesn't matter - their one downside being that they can't hold objectives makes absolute sense (and was also the case in 7th edition so people should be used to it).
If you just raise the cost of the unit, their overall utility is reduced significantly - this way, they're still just as good at support as they should be, but you just need to bring foot soldiers to hold territory, which is how it absolutely should be. I do think that hover mode flyers should be able to hold objectives while hovering though, as per 7th edition.
|
|
|
Post by Nick P on Aug 10, 2017 11:12:41 GMT -6
Silly question: but if I'm correct these rules take effect now don't they? Okay well overall I think it's fine. The additional rules that is. Obj sec. Is restricted to a specific faction detachment/s, first turn roll off is better cause honest it just limited the whole list building aspect, and flyers not holding objectives...while great overall people seem to be forgetting about chaos's heldrake. Its not as good as the other flyers available and now it can't hold objectives (plus it doesn't have supersonic or hard to hit). Still overall the change-up is fine. I'm curious though what else they might change. Also when is the "chapter approved" book coming out? Or is it just similar to FAQ? These rules are not official until the book is released, since we don't have the whole picture right now - just 3 blurbs of specific rules, but there are going to be more changes in the book and they all interact to balance the game out depending on which missions you use, so I would be hesitant to cherry pick them. The book comes out in December, its just that the NOVA tournament rules are going to be using them as a sneak peak so the community can see how the changes stack up to using just the BRB and FAQs.
|
|
|
Post by rogerspacem on Aug 10, 2017 12:07:50 GMT -6
Thanks Nick for that clarification. Wanted to be sure I read that right. I hear you on the flyers. Flyers shouldn't hold objectives. It's thing a that is necessary (or at least I do believe it is meant only for support not gaining objs.) just sucks for the heldrake cause I don't think that model isn't any good... Well okay its just OK, but too expensive. Maybe with the new point cost reduction it be more reliable to bring. Still if this chapter approved is a book it isn't going for much then right?
|
|
|
Post by Nick P on Aug 10, 2017 15:21:49 GMT -6
I imagine it will be similar to the generals handbook for AoS, since it's basically an annual conmpilation of faqs and rules updates to the main core book. So whatever that goes for, $30 or so? I would imagine is what chapter approved will do.
|
|
Andy
initiate
Posts: 219
|
Post by Andy on Aug 10, 2017 15:32:05 GMT -6
They also went through the book on today's twitch broadcast. The rules updates will all be in the online FAQ - and all of them are being used at (and are in the rules pack for) the Nova Open (US) and Blood and Glory (UK).
|
|
|
Post by Eric formerly Eric on Aug 10, 2017 15:33:37 GMT -6
Good. If the faq keeps getting updated for free online, ill be a happy camper.
|
|